Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No no, the question is why someone rags on M8/M8.2 incessantly partly because of its "cropped sensor" (of 1.3x) and then go ga ga over Ricoh GRX's M module even though it's ... 1.5x cropped. Clearly even Leica agrees that something needs to sit between M9 and X1, otherwise they wouldn't banter the yet to be released mirriorless system already. Until they actually release something (late 2012?), potential users will have to be content with used M8/8.2 or the new GRX M module etc. Heck, the Epson R-D1 still has a number of loyal users!!! On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:21 PM, <afirkin at afirkin.com> wrote: >> So (other than IR filters) what makes this better than an M8? >> >> john > > If you mean the M9 v M8 there are a lot of benefits: > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]