Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Mark. Good to know. Bob Bob Adler http://www.rgaphoto.com On Aug 12, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: >> From all accounts this was strictly an outer mechanical upgrade with no > tweaks to the glass itself. If I had to do it again I'd get the one without > the built in shade. Its design is a little rough. Flimsy and in the way > which his evident at first fondle. It descends when you want it extended > and extends when you want it collapsed. Some have opted to have it removed > with the jaws of life. > They are doing better with shades now. > With no shade you'd have the option of playing around with other perhaps > smaller shades from other sources and see which one may be more to ones > liking. 60mm if I recall. And you can just use as Ted does, no shade. > > -- > Mark R. > > > >> From: Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:28:05 -0700 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: [Leica] Noctilux versions >> >> Hi All. >> Just curious on any opinions. Is there optically a big/better difference >> between the last Nocti 1.0 version with built in hood and the previous >> version >> without the hood? >> Thanks for any and all guidance, >> Bob >> >> Bob Adler >> http://www.rgaphoto.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information