[Leica] unsubscribe

[hd at hd.pp.se (Håkan Dennersten)]

 unsubscribe hd at hd.pp.se  

--  
H?kan Dennersten
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)

On torsdag 21 juli 2011 at 07:42, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> I agree with all who suggest using a longer lens and shooting vertically. 
> Of course this means more frames to merge and hence more horsepower needed 
> on the computer, but that should not be a problem in this day and age. The 
> panos I have posted have usually been made with a 50mm on an M8, using 
> 10-15 frames to create a 180-200 degree image.
>  
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>  
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>  
> YNWA
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> On Jul 20, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>  
> > Ken I am not familiar with what tools are in Elements 8. In Photoshop 
> > there
> > are a number of different merge options that you can try.
> > My approach is to use a 35 and shoot vertically. On the M9 I use 30 
> > degree
> > increments for the shots to be merged.
> > With Howard Cummer's cooperation, we put some discussion in the LUG 
> > Pearls
> > blog here
> > http://wiki.leica-users.org/index.php/Panorama_Photography
> > In the example there I did 12 frames (360 degrees) and this is a crop of
> > about 4 frames from that.
> >  
> > A couple of newer samples here.
> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/133487302
> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/133506658
> >  
> >  
> > Cheers
> > Geoff
> >  
> > *Australia, paying for the world's carbon sins, one tonne at a time**.*
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > On 21 July 2011 07:02, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr 
> > (mailto:philippe.amard at sfr.fr)> wrote:
> >  
> > > Pano shooting with a 21 does not make much sense to me either - just 
> > > use a
> > > longer lens and shoot more frames to cover what you want to show.
> > > ph
> > >  
> > > Le 20 juil. 11 ? 21:27, Mark Rabiner a ?crit :
> > >  
> > >  
> > > > Shot with a 21?
> > > > The trick would be to shoot with a much longer lens but do more 
> > > > individual
> > > > shots and you'll get your full angle. Shoot verticals.
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > Mark William Rabiner
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > From: Kenneth Frazier <kennybod at mac.com (mailto:kennybod at 
> > > > mac.com)>
> > > > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org (mailto:lug at 
> > > > > leica-users.org)>
> > > > > Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:07:05 -0400
> > > > > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org (mailto:lug at 
> > > > > leica-users.org)>
> > > > > Subject: [Leica] Pano help needed.....
> > > > >  
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > >  
> > > > > Here's my first attempt at a pano shot, of Baltimore's inner 
> > > > > harbor,
> > > > > stitched
> > > > > from three shots.
> > > > >  
> > > > > http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/kennybod/baltimore+**
> > > > > inner+harbor.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/baltimore+inner+harbor.jpg.html>
> > > > >  
> > > > > I need some assistance. The photo has good detail, good color 
> > > > > matching,
> > > > > but
> > > > > lots of distortion at either end.
> > > > >  
> > > > > I put the three shots through LR3, then stitched them in Photoshop
> > > > > Elements 8.
> > > > >  
> > > > > Suggestions? How to eliminate all the distortion? Obviously I'm 
> > > > > missing
> > > > > something in the workflow.
> > > > >  
> > > > > TIA
> > > > >  
> > > > > Ken
> > > > >  
> > > > >  
> > > > > --------------------------
> > > > > Kenneth Frazier
> > > > > kennybod at me.com (mailto:kennybod at me.com)
> >  
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information