Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PANO...third version, better?
From: kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:57:14 -0400
References: <A7D03CC2-169C-4982-B7B5-940CCE8BD52E@mac.com> <D67DE2EF-A293-45F1-AF5E-CB705872E554@mac.com>
 
On Jul 20, 2011, at 9:53 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> hough you've lost the aesthetic quality of the foreground elements in the 
> original. For me fine panos seem to need foreground elements to work 
> successfully.


I would tend to agree, and I may try again, using the discarded image.

Ken
--------------------------
Kenneth Frazier
kennybod at me.com
kennybod at mac.com
In reply to: Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] PANO...third version, better?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] PANO...third version, better?)