Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] PANO...third version, better?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:53:48 -0500
References: <A7D03CC2-169C-4982-B7B5-940CCE8BD52E@mac.com>
 
On Jul 20, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Kenneth Frazier <kennybod at mac.com> wrote:

> Folks, here's the 3rd version of the Baltimore Inner Harbor pano.
> 
> To my eye it appears much better:
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kennybod/baltimore+inner+harbor+3.jpg.html
> 
> Comments apprciated.

Technically you've solved the distortion issues. Though you've lost the 
aesthetic quality of the foreground elements in the original. For me fine 
panos seem to need foreground elements to work successfully.

George
Replies: Reply from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] PANO...third version, better?)
 In reply to: Message from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] PANO...third version, better?)