Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digital vs. film cost
From: john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:37:32 +1200
References: <048FD405-9514-4A94-AA22-82ABBAF3B80D@archiphoto.com> <CA4AA73E.121A7%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
The thickness of the emulsion made it not as sharp as E6 AFAIR

john

-----Original Message-----

I had heard there was some use of color neg for such commercial work but
most photographers seemed to have looked at their chrome films as a
religion.  They thought of color neg as wedding photographer food.
In reply to: Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Digital vs. film cost)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Digital vs. film cost)