Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]And sometimes I had to do a ring around with filtration for indoor architectural work with mixed lighting, which multiplied that times 9. That's why I also shot colour neg as soon as it started to do a good job. Fine tuning of colour and exposure could be done in the lab; shooting time decreased to 1/2 or 1/3 and material costs dropped to 5-10%. On 2011-07-18, at 4:15 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > > On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> Not only is it not pennies but dollars a frame but part of transparency >> shooting is bracketing. Which means your covering yourself whenever you >> can >> with lots of exposures of any semi critical subject out in the field >> shooting city or land scapes if its worth getting its worth getting right >> and you learn a lot about your materials in the processs. Also the best >> "dupe" is the one make at the time in camera. So you are in effect backing >> yourself up holding your figure down. > > There IT is. > > Words from a fellow brother > who has most certainly shot transparencies > for commercial use by > advertising agencies, magazines and corporate clients. > > Each set-up required a minimum of 3 brackets X 2. > That's 6 sheets of 8x10 or 4x5 or half a role of 120 (6x6). > > > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Henning Wulff henningw at archiphoto.com