Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital vs film cost
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:14:40 -0700
References: <CACcosUP8T7uTzLTRM8UHScSNmGeVff8=xQ2H9kLPzBBdi465_g@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you Larry :-)

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Fortunately the cost of film vs. digital for Leica users can be settled 
> with
> a sharp pencil and a pocket calculator. Everyone is right. It pays for the
> pros to switch, it is marginal for the advanced amateur, and a poor bargain
> for everyone else.
>
>
> Film cost of each frame including developing (approximate, based on
> Freestyle catalog):
>
> Category 1: B&W, bulk loaded, self processed = $.05
>
> Category 2: B&W, 36 exp. purchased rolls, commercially processed = $.20
>
> Category 3: Color, 36 exp. rolls, commercially processed = $.30
>
>
> Professional photographer:
>
> Has first class film equipment and lenses. Buys new digital body. Shoots 
> 200
> frames a day, 40,000 frames per working year. Cost of new Leica or Canon
> body $7000.
>
> Category 1 - Digital break even point in 700 working days (10 years).
>
> Category 2 - Break even point in 175 days (about 6 months).
>
> Category 3 - Break even point in 117 days (about 4 months).
>
>
> Advanced amateur photographer (Typical LUG member)
>
> Has Leica M camera, several lenses. Buys M9 body. Shoots 30 frames a day,
> 9000 per year.
>
> Category 1: Break even point, 15.5 years.
>
> Category 2: Break even point, 3.9 years.
>
> Category 3: Break even point, 2.6 years.
>
>
> Casual Leica shooter, M body, some lenses, shoots 10 frames a day, 3000 per
> year.
>
> Category 1: Break even point, 47 years.
>
> Category 2: Break even point, 12 years.
>
> Category 3: Break even point, 7.8 years.
>
>
> Typical weekend photographer, uses camera on vacations, birthdays and
> holidays, shoots 300 pictures a year.
>
> FUGGEDABOUDIT - you won't live long enough to break even on a digital 
> Leica.
> Stick to film.
>
>
> If you are not a pro or a compulsive shooter and you MUST have a digital
> Leica, buy a used M8 or wait to buy your used M9 until after the M10 is
> introduced. Incidentally the cost of a $7000 loan to buy a new camera is
> $420/year at a bank, $1120/year if charged to your credit card.
>
>
> Larry Z
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
previous replies in your msgs. ]


Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost EYES!)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Digital vs film cost)