Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Ric, apparently not, I have a couple of other shots of the same subject without flash (a little shaky, but exactly the same problem). Cheers Douglas On 16.07.2011 22:32, Ric Carter wrote: > i notice the flash was used > > is that part of the problem? > > ric > > > On Jul 16, 2011, at 3:51 PM, scleroplex wrote: > >> brilliant!! >> :-) >> bharani >> >> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:18:33 +0200 >> From: Douglas Sharp<douglas.sharp at gmx.de> >> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail >> go/over-saturation? >> To: Leica Users Group<lug at leica-users.org> >> Message-ID:<4E21C7E9.7020406 at gmx.de> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" >> >> Thanks to all for the constructive comments, >> >> I put them into practice: >> >> 1) I recalibrated my monitor with a Spyder 2.0 and >> started over again from RAW in LR >> >> 2) Converted to jpeg in LR as usual for the LUG Gallery >> (highest quality) >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DMS/album150/Recalibrated_Monitor_Centre.jpg.html >> >> Still no detail! >> >> 3) converted to tiff in LR - the detail I could see in >> lower petal of the middle flower in the original RAW >> image is still there >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DMS/album150/Recalibrated_Monitor_Crop.TIF.html >> >> Looks like the problem of what looks like >> over-saturation and loss of detail is a format >> conversion problem >> >> Cheers >> Douglas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >