Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Crane fly (bottoms up)
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:44:33 -0400
References: <4E1BBF12.4000608@halcyon.com> <CA420BDE.11BFE%mark@rabinergroup.com>

You'd better not live in Oak Park, Michigan, if you want to grow vegetables
in your front yard instead of a lawn:

http://www.care2.com/causes/mother-facing-jail-for-growing-veggies.html

Tina

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

> I'm anti lawn. Took mine out. Now I don't have one here either.
> We should all take out our lawns and grow vegetables on them. Make salad
> for
> dinner.
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
> > From: Larry Bullis <kingfisher at halcyon.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:27:14 -0700
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: [Leica]  IMG: Cranefly (bottoms up)
> >
> > I once had a job to shoot the cranefly and its pupae for a magazine on
> > the West Coast of the US called Sunset, which (even now) has as one of
> > its major foci, gardening. The editor explained to me that craneflies
> > are important pests because the larvae destroy lawns. They eat the
> > roots. He said "You'll love craneflies". I got that particular job, I
> > think, because he knew that I didn't have much use for lawns in
> > residential settings. It's a personal quirk of mine, I guess. I don't
> > like to mow them, I don't like how much water they consume, and I prefer
> > things that I can eat. Mostly, I don't like the neighborhood politics
> > that revolve around them. I could tell stories, I could.
> >
> > A vernacular name for craneflies out here, anyway, is "Mosquito Eaters".
> > They don't. They eat lawns, as you say, George, "Bottoms up".
> >
> > What I like especially about this image is that it is clear, easy to
> > read, and perfectly descriptive. If you have ever seen one of these
> > things, the recognition is immediate.
> >
> > Larry
> >
> > On 7/11/11 6:54 PM, lug-request at leica-users.org wrote:
> >> NIce almost abstract photo. Cheers, Michiel Fokkema On 10-7-2011 23:25,
> >> George Lottermoser wrote:
> >>>>  <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=5472>
> >>>>
> >>>>  c&c always welcome
> >>>>
> >>>>  Regards,
> >>>>  George Lottermoser
> >>>>  george at imagist.com
> >>>>  http://www.imagist.com
> >>>>  http://www.imagist.com/blog
> >>>>  http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  _______________________________________________
> >>>>  Leica Users Group.
> >>>>  Seehttp://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug  for more information
> >> -- ----------------------- Fokkema Fotografie www.michielfokkema.com
> >> +31(0)615569576
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMG: Crane fly (bottoms up))
In reply to: Message from kingfisher at halcyon.com (Larry Bullis) ([Leica] IMG: Cranefly (bottoms up))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Crane fly (bottoms up))