Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Lluis, do you mean that there is a difference between the printing of images taken with digital cameras and film cameras? or do you mean that there is a difference between the images taken in whichever medium and how they actually turn out in the book? Peter On 11/07/2011 00:49, Lluis Ripoll wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thank you very much, I'm very glad you've liked the printing and I really > appreciate your comment. I agree that Blurb has really improved the B&W > printing > quality, but I appreciate sometimes a very slight, really few noticeable, > tone > to magenta rather than pure B&W. I've compared my pictures from film and my > pictures from digital on the books Geoff has published (12 & 19 Leica > Photographers) and I see a very slight difference in the tone of the > pictures > comming from film or from digital. > > Cheers > Lluis > > > > El 10/07/2011, a las 18:29, Peter Dzwig escribi?: > >> ...arrived a few days ago. >> >> Just to say that it is better than I inagined from the Blurb blurb - and >> the >> cover shot has printed brilliantly. >> >> Actually it seems to me that Blurb have upped their game a bit; quality >> seems >> somewhat improved over the last book I saw. But it is helped by the >> photographs. >> >> Congratulations, Lluis >> >> Peter >> -- >> >> =========================================================== >> Dr Peter Dzwig >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- =========================================================== Dr Peter Dzwig