Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another "Which ones suck more" post
From: richard at (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:06:35 -0700
References: <>

Peter, do you use a Mac? I just look at the images on the Mac, and they look
hideous :-)

The 2.2 Gamma thing really lift the shadow up beyond what I see, with ugly

First of all, I can assure you that my prints match what I see fairly well,
and those uglies are not there. Second, the images will be projected, I
believe, which uses PC :-)

Still, I will see what I can do for the Mac viewers.


On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Peter Cheyne <geordiepete211 at>wrote:

> Hi, Richard,
> I've seen a few of these before, but they work even better in this
> slideshow presentation.  I could say a lot about what I really like about
> the photographs, but you didn't ask for that.
> I don't find any of them sucky.  However:
> Rocks - is grainy in the shadows, there are too many grey speckles in the
> shadows for me.  Also, there is a strange, oddly-shaped shadow on the sea 
> on
> the left.  That shadow itself is distracting, as is the grain in it.  I
> still like the photograph though.
> Life on the Edge - ditto about the grain.
> Albion Point - ditto about grain in shadows, especially on the cliffs on
> the left hand side.
> All the best,
> Peter
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
>  more information

// richard <>
// icc blog: <>
// richard's personal photo blog: <>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]

Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Another "Which ones suck more" post)
In reply to: Message from geordiepete211 at (Peter Cheyne) ([Leica] Another "Which ones suck more" post)