Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:05:18 -0400

So not only are you not going to post a shot to the lug gallery from your 21
your not going to tell us which shots on your page was done with one.!?
Its all pretty vague. Kind of like the results you'd get from Leicas first
21.

Mark William Rabiner


> From: Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:27:55 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH
> 
> Mark, I usually post what lens I am using when I post the picture.  I shoot
> with three lenses on my Leica; the 21, the 35 asph and lately the 28 asph.
> I also shoot with my Oly and that's two more lenses.  Hover the picture and
> if it starts with an L it is Leica.  If it is wide angle it is a 21.
> 
> If my pictures were jarring you because my lens was a dog, you'd think you
> might have said something since I post at least twice a week.  In pure
> numbers only Lluis and the two Jims post more than me.
> 
> http://sonc.com/look/?p=679
> 
> 
> http://sonc.com/look/?p=697
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at 
> rabinergroup.com>wrote:
> 
>> Wouldn't it make more sense way before this point to simply post one of
>> your
>> blameless shots done with the lens?
>> Instead of these repeated  indignations.
>> 
>> We're supposed to looking through your website for what?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:16:53 -0500
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>
>> wrote:
>>>> He also says "It does not bear the Leica badge with full honour." on
>>> http://www.imx.nl/photo/leica/lenses/lenses/lenses/page86.html
>>> 
>>> You know John, I did not read that when I made the decision to get rid of
>>> the little CV in favor of the Pre-asph 21.  I had them both.  I tried
>> them
>>> both.
>>> 
>>> I haven't had many people talk about how much distortion my pictures have
>>> been ever since I started using the Leica 21 and sold the CV.  Maybe
>> someone
>>> can cruise through my website and pick out which are which?   Maybe
>> someone
>>> can even figure out which were shot with the Leica and the Panasonic?
>>> 
>>> Sheesh.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Sonny
>>> http://sonc.com/look/
>>> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>>> 
>>> USA
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Sonny
> http://sonc.com/look/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> 
> USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH)
In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH)