Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They work well, as Nathan says, on the GF-1, but they are very difficult to focus properly wide open on the EVF. If you have to stop down, why use Leica lenses in the first place? I think the quality of the viewfinder is critical, so check that out. Alternatively use ultra wides where focusing is a non issue. Cheers Jayanand On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>wrote: > Hi Jan, > > I find that using M lenses on my GF-1 works quite well. I use the adapter > from Cameraquest. In fact, I just bought the 12mm non-rangefinder coupled > CV > lens, and it works brilliantly on the GF-1. And of course the fact that it > is not rangefinder-coupled is of no consequence in this case. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > YNWA > > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Jan Decher wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > What's currently the best way to take my M and ZM lenses to digital > > (outside of M8/M9)? > > > > I considering buying a Micro 4/3rds body (Olympus, Panasonic) perhaps > with > > one indigenous "pancake-type" lens and the M adapter. Any issues with > > metering, manual focussing etc. to be aware of? > > > > Which adapter is the best (Novoflex, CameraQuest, EBAY China-made...)? > > Thanks, > > Jan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >