Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:56:51 -0700
References: <CA26E55E.109B3%mark@rabinergroup.com> <4D6652AA-1948-47E6-B8DC-F0B1D0720403@frozenlight.eu>

35 R was a great lens in two and 3 cam versions  Mark in PDX
On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:45 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Is this why you continue to crap on the M8, the MFT and CV lenses? Based 
> on personal experience?
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
> 
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:18 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
>> Me whenever I like a lens its always because some where along the line I
>> seemed to have taken a picture with it. Then I blow some of I it up in my
>> darkroom. Then hang it on the wall or put it in a portfolio and show it to
>> people.  That's when I start liking the lens, seeing what results it makes
>> for me.  Not because it feels real good in my hand one day ... Here its 
>> now
>> sounding like all theoretical rhetoric. I really think those days of just
>> BS'ing on photo chat lists are over.
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] 35mm Summicron R lens - good , bad, so so?)