Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]A copy would not be made on 35mm film again it would be made on 4x5 sheet film but even then to say that Picto or any custom printer printed HCB prints for collectors for any conceivable reason is a slam to Picto which is absurd and they'd surely not appreciate nor would the collectors buying those prints. A print from EVEN an 4x5 copy neg is a huge compromise compared to a print from the original negative. Not matter how carefully its done put those prints side by side and no one wants the copy of the copy. Which is why its not done. In any other graphics process the lower you are in the run the move value the print. NOT in photography where printing from an original negative does not damage the neg at all. conceivably millions of prints can me made from an original negative. Perhaps a dupe would be made in case of fire or for record keeping purposes. It might seem logical that somewhere from someone who had to made extensive dodging and burning manipulations to make a print from a certain neg that copy neg from the print might be in the workflow I'd like an example which could be corroborated by a URL of such a case I doubt its at all common if it exists at all. I'd highly doubt I'd would be in the case of an HCB neg as he was not going to be making the print in the first place. I have to say this because this absurdity has been repeated on the list more than once and more than twice. It shows a basic lack of common sense of the basics of photography technique. A basic rule being keep the generations to a minimum. A copy of a copy is not what anyone ever wants at all. There is little to no excuse for it. If I found out a print id bought for real money was made for a copy neg I'd demand my money back on the spot. And I think even the stupidest collectors would do the same. Mark By the way look at the cut side you can make out a corner of a sprocket hole and also the number 39. What it looks like to me is its the last shot on the roll which often gets damaged. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner