Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2011/06/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Horrible but stunning
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:37:49 -0500
References: <BANLkTinSGW5a10ofzgUkSUNr1k9nrrwTXg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin3NBRFzN2ogo+Eee-5ZK5TvT7mNg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikwcrkAJKA5yo7D0bjUPamtBJ2LwA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=MUXvR5_Lt=U+U7h07CrkF40Yr6g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik8SGm2X9MRx4AuJnmW84WX89yC8Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=juxBKLzADWtw82N_mfwAsZ6_DNw@mail.gmail.com>
On Jun 9, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> All I wish for that photojournalists should make some sort of statement
> about their viewpoints on the whole matter. I do not mean to question
> Darcy's integrity or anything or that sort, but I want to know - what's the
> glory in it for them?!
A photograph has picked up a fact of life, and that fact will live forever.
- Raghu Rai
(or at least as long as the photograph survives)
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to:
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Horrible but stunning)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Horrible but stunning)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Horrible but stunning)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Horrible but stunning)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Horrible but stunning)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Horrible but stunning)