Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Last Kodachrome
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:54:46 -0600
References: <510786390.1593877.1295135202540.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu>

On 1/15/2011 5:46 PM, Alan Magayne-Roshak wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 Ken Carney<kcarney1 at cox.net>wrote:
>
>> I was working on something last night and noticed that Exposure 3 has:
>> Kodachrome 1936-1962
>> Kodachrome II 1962-1974
>> Kodachrome 25
>> Kodachrome 64
>> Kodachrome 200
>> There should be something there for everyone.  I have no idea how
>> accurate these are, but then I if I don't like the in-camera result I
>> just poke around until I find a "film" that seems to suit the image.
>> Kodachrome 200 and Velvia 50 seem to come up frequently.
>> Ken
> ==================================================================================================
> If I can't shoot Kodachrome, I don't want to pretend I'm using it.  I 
> don't like the idea of simulating film.  Instead, I'll let my color 
> pictures look digital because that's what they will have to be, and use 
> B&W film when I want monochrome (which is most of the time), since I like 
> using my film cameras more than any digital camera I have access to.
>
> Alan
>
> Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer
> UPAA POY 1978
> University Information Technology Services
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> amr3 at uwm.edu
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Right, I would not want to present a photo as Kodachrome or whatever 
unless it was, just as I would not want to present an inkjet print as 
one of my platinum prints (although, once behind glass.......).  As I 
mentioned, I just use the PS plug-ins to get the effect I like for a 
particular image - it might be Exposure 3 "film stock" or something 
else.  Fortunately, I am just an amateur who has fun with his hobby and 
does not have to be concerned with strictures.   This behavior is 
probably traced to the darkroom, where I took to things such as burning 
and dodging, split filtering, unsharp masks and such.  I know what you 
mean about the film cameras.  I still have my 4x5 and 8x10 outfits, and 
some 120 and 35mm, and can't bring myself to sell them.

Ken


In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] Last Kodachrome)