Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Javier Perez wrote: > > I had a roll I was meaning to get processed but forgot about. It wasn't > even mine. It came with an old camera I bought about 10 years ago. The > roll has the older orangish end caps. After doing some research I figured > it might not take to modern development because Kodak had made some sort > of change to the film and this can was pretty old. Does anybody know if > there are any bootleg developing efforts being planned other than black > and white? Javier, if there is interest in the roll, likely it's about content, why not develop it in bw? Steve > Javier > >> From: steve.barbour at gmail.com >> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:32:20 -0800 >> To: lug at leica-users.org >> Subject: Re: [Leica] last Kodachrome >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2011, at 8:15 AM, EPL wrote: >> >>> Just got my last Kodachromes back from Dwayne's today and I am again >>> reminded/floored by the quality of the rendition possible with the film >>> (I >>> shot mostly K25): the lovely, subtle transitions from light to shadow. >>> >>> I'll put some up on te LUG Gallery soon. >> >> yes ...please share them, >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> >>> >>> But I wonder: is there any way to get this kind of result with some >>> digital >>> magic? If someone has a trick, or some "Kodachrome-like" method they can >>> share, do tell! >>> >>> Most high-end digital work still looks like plastic to me! >>> >>> Emanuel >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information