Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why didn't the DMR need UV/IR filters?
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:06:50 -0800
References: <BLU0-SMTP21E1EE2439D8B19072589F8C080@phx.gbl>

I think the DMR has a more normal IR blocking filter.

The M8 uses a very thin one to get the best out of those non-retrofocus M
lens.

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:

> umm,
>
> Why didn't the DMR need UV/IR filters, when the M8 did?
>
> I know they weren't the same sensor, but did it have to do with the
> back-focus distance?  i.e. steeper ray angle needing UV/IR management?
>
>
> Vick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Why didn't the DMR need UV/IR filters?)
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Why didn't the DMR need UV/IR filters?)