Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, the 20 is great. The 14-45 is good with Topaz Infocus. Just not for anything with lots of detail like landscapes. With the 14-45 it is an ISO 100 outfit IMHO. Best, Ken On 12/19/2010 8:01 PM, R. Clayton McKee wrote: > --- On Sun, 12/19/10, Ken Carney<kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote: > > >> Nice car. I have been using the >> GF-1 also with the EVF and 20 1.7. > I've noticed. There's some very nice stuff in the gallery with your name > on it. > >> Even the 14-45 is pretty good so long as used within its >> limitations. > > To an extent it's the limitations that bother me. For me it's a little > slow for a body with unexceptional low-light performance. > > I am looking at the 14, though... and I wouldn't mind having the 25/1.4. > > But until the budget improves, the 20 is a happy medium. > > R. Clayton McKee > PhotoJournalist > from somewhere just south of somewhere else... > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >