Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/12/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:19:51 -0800
References: <6EC54D83-17B9-4BC0-946C-E6BE51C5CA8C@gmail.com> <FBCD94E5-4FDC-4DF4-8E5F-251163DB062F@mac.com> <D41F95FE-804C-4693-9B40-987C362FAAE3@gmail.com> <696AB2AD-F395-438E-BC7E-3EDEB0FC074F@gmail.com>
Well, since opened my big mouth again, I may as well continue:
It's a fine photo.
My opinions, and they are worth the electrons they are written on, is really
to echo what Sonny said originally, but in less eloquent words.
Just left scratching my head, that's all.
--
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]
Replies:
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] NOW: What is a "Fine Photograph" ? was The perfect Photographer)
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Re. The perfect Photographer)