Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Improved or not?
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:57:40 +0100
References: <329D8115-6155-4FFA-86DF-2E9F241B5DB5@gmail.com>

it is improved, but looks a bit "processed" in a way your images usually do 
not. Are you playing with some new software?

Saludos,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

YNWA







On Nov 29, 2010, at 2:30 AM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:

> I've worked more on this picture tryng to give it more light or more 
> "life", IMO it is improved, maybe the first version was a little dark, 
> here is the last version:
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Colliure/L1016911+new2seapxylW.jpg.html
> 
> and this one is the previous
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Colliure/L1016911bwse5.jpg.html
> 
> I will appreciate very much your c&c,  thanks for looking
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
> Blog:
> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Improved or not?)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Improved or not?)