Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/11/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:07:18 -0600
References: <C8FD7E98.6320%mark@rabinergroup.com> <529686F3EB724B03A0DEBEF92EFE19E1@syneticfeba505> <412B27BA635543079FFE29F57C2BAC41@jimnichols> <6DDD4824-819A-484A-B775-3F23BF9F399A@mac.com> <D7CBF09A9F0E4BF393A22D3332E8899A@syneticfeba505>
We part ways a bit here.
I consider strobes a blessing
and use them when appropriate
to achieve the desired result.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:31 PM, tedgrant at shaw.ca wrote:
> " Without the horrid FLASH APPARATUS!" :-) ;-)
Replies:
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))