Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Understood. Thanks for commenting.This is actually produced from a single exposure though, no blended multiple frames nor versions nor HDR processes. Largely the reason for showing this again (and initially going back to shoot it around mid-day ). Intentional exposure for sky and then darks have tolerated something more than two stops exposure increase in post, selectively Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman NO ARCHIVE On 30 October 2010 12:30, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> wrote: > Looks just a little tad too HDR to me. May be dial down the post just a > little? > > YMMV of course > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Currently reworking galleries and some photos. This was exposed to > preserve > > the sky tone originally and has had local exposure alteration in Post. > > Interesting for me was the window reflections creating an illusion of > > transparency. The structure is in fact preserved still damaged and is > > largely hollow but this section has had windows refitted. > > http://www.pbase.com/image/129883098 > > > > Cheers > > Geoff > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> > // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous > replies in your msgs. ] > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >