Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 40 Summicron on M9
From: hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:25:34 -0400
References: <AANLkTimyEm=nj2+ZnunvRwR5EAwhXVaJ13=ZRL71kN7o@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimnninYqdVhYZedQzuibt83gsAPJwpVj1tv9=C2@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP87BD58BFFF7FD6BF51825A8C400@phx.gbl> <DF8D592A-E0FE-40F1-8511-9999AE0DFF48@bex.net> <019701cb7339$f5b8cc10$e12a6430$@earthlink.net>
 
Frank, there are codes for three 135s: the 2.8 Elmarit-M, the 3.4 APO Telyt, 
and the 4 Tele-Elmar.

Mark, I think that lenses with FLs of 35mm and higher don't need correction.

?howard

On Oct 24, 2010, at 1:11 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> The only 135 that I know is coded is the one with the Eyes.....  IS that
> still correct or is the APO Telyt also coded?
> 
> This is FYI info only.....
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Howard Ritter
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 9:21 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 40 Summicron on M9
> 
> Needed or not, the internal database of the M9 has codes for 35 thru 135 
> mm,
> as well as 16 thru 28, but the 40 isn't one of them.
> 
> I do have an M9. Now. Hee-he.
> 
> -howard
Replies: Reply from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] 40 Summicron on M9)
 In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] 40 Summicron on M9)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 40 Summicron on M9)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 40 Summicron on M9)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] 40 Summicron on M9)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 40 Summicron on M9)