Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D700
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:02:12 -0400
References: <AANLkTimjS2d218X6uV83jE4+JZyPWfizocV8dHgKKcFV@mail.gmail.com> <C8E7F0B7.569A%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Has Texas been redesigned 4 times? 
Does everybody have to like Texas? 

Phil Forrest


On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:53:59 -0400
Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> Its been completely designed optically 4 different times.
> Its like saying you don't like Texas.
> 
> 
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> mark at rabinergroup.com
> Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:04:18 +1030
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> > 
> > The new 24-120 is just as bad as the first one.  I don't know if
> > it's been redesigned optically, but it is cosmetically different
> > and has AF-S and VR.  When I tested a Nikon D700 that was the lens
> > that Nikon sent with the camera.  I thought something was wrong
> > with the camera until I tried it with some better glass.
> > 
> > I agree on VR; it's great.  It's just a shame that subject movement
> > makes it less useful for what I do, but a camera with built-in
> > anti-shake and good f1.4 lenses would be nice.
> > 
> > Marty
> > 
> > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Mark Rabiner
> > <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> >>> From what I know the 24-120 established a bad rep from day one
> >>> but was
> >> completely redone a few years later then completely redone again
> >> then a few years later completely redone again with VR. It could
> >> be ok by now though I like zooms which vear on the conservative
> >> side. But the 24-120 has VR. And VR is a not to be an
> >> underestimated game changer.
> >> 
> >> Voucher Recharge
> >> Verification Requirement
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------------------
> >> Mark William Rabiner
> >> Photography
> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> >> mark at rabinergroup.com
> >> Cars: ? http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:19:10 +1030
> >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> >>> 
> >>> I don't like zooms. ?The 24-70 2.8 AF-S is decent. ?The 24-120 is
> >>> the worst; the real dog of the Nikkor range.
> >>> 
> >>> Just about any wide range zoom is hopeless for architectural work.
> >>> 
> >>> Marty
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> >> information
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] D700)