Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D700
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:17:08 -0400

Well we'll compare my prints from my lens with the ones you got from yours.


--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com
Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb




> From: Christopher Williams <zoeica at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:46:13 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> 
> The Internet knows all, but not as much as me.
> 
> Chris
> 
> Developed from my iHolga
> 
> 
> On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
>> My experience with using the lens extensively for the past 7.1 years seems
>> to differ with yours Christopher! As does every known source on the
>> internet! 
>> This one is better than the current one.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Christopher Williams <zoeica at mac.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:53:04 -0500
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
>>> 
>>> Sorry but that lens is one of the worst ones Nikon ever made. At 24 it's 
>>> a
>>> joke. The f4 version was slightly improved.
>>> 
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Developed from my iHolga
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Nope its an older real lens.
>>>> FX or
>>>> FF
>>>> Nikon 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 ED AF-S G
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2485afs.htm
>>>> http://www.bythom.com/2485lens.htm
>>>> http://www.momentcorp.com/review/nikkor24-85_35.htm
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --------------------
>>>> Mark William Rabiner Photography
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>> Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>>>> mark at rabinergroup.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Kyle Cassidy <leicaslacker at gmail.com>
>>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:51:03 -0400
>>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
>>>>> 
>>>>> as long as it's not DX!
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My 24 to 85 G lens seems to be all I'd need 99.9 of the time.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] D700)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] D700)
In reply to: Message from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] D700)