Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Yet another reason to stop using film
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:39:42 -0500
References: <A1BC47E9-C7B6-4761-8CAA-45CD5B0B8F23@mac.com> <E866333C-8084-4FEE-990A-5B906B8B9488@gmail.com> <48C9F63A-26F8-42BF-AC31-9B284F78C050@embarqmail.com> <4F58591C-2850-438B-887F-F4248A9E0B91@bellsouth.net>

  I remember looking through these.  It was great fun at the time.  
Then, there was a plausible defense of ignorance.  Now, it is just 
statistics.  IMHO.

Ken

http://www.wisconsinhistory.org/museum/artifacts/archives/002457.asp

Ken

On 9/30/2010 6:49 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> If it is x-rays powerful enough to penetrate steel, it's going to be 
> seriously bad for fetuses and adults. Homeless people sleeping in their 
> cars will get some serious ionizing radiation.
>
> Jeffery
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Ric Carter wrote:
>
>> i fear for the fetuses who get zapped with this amount of radiation in 
>> their first week or so of gestation
>>
>> ric
>>
>>
>> On Sep 30, 2010, at 7:38 PM, kyle cassidy on the LUG wrote:
>>
>>> ah, i remember the old foolish days when the police needed a warrant to 
>>> search someone -- back before we learned that photographer were 
>>> terrorists.
>>>



Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at bellsouth.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yet another reason to stop using film)
In reply to: Message from smithjeffery at mac.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yet another reason to stop using film)
Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG) ([Leica] Yet another reason to stop using film)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Yet another reason to stop using film)
Message from jsmith342 at bellsouth.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Yet another reason to stop using film)