Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] flowers with an old old (& rare) leica
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:35:01 +0200
References: <99F8AD15-ABF8-4F51-B422-D74005A1CA47@gmail.com>

Kyle, you can even get more radical--remember those funny old cameras with 
no LCD screen and no batteries?

;-)

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

YNWA





On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:25 PM, kyle cassidy on the LUG wrote:

> If you had an old old rare leica (as I do) then you could be producing 
> flower images such as this:
> 
> http://www.kylecassidy.com/lj/2010/dinosaur-leica3.jpg
> 
> (At FULL RESOLUTION!) 
> 
> The Leica Digiux is superior to nearly all other cameras because it makes 
> you think when you photograph. You can't simply blaze away because you 
> have about fourteen photos before you need to pause and change the card, 
> so every shot must be the right shot. Also, the batteries last for about 
> 16 images without using the LCD, so chimping is frowned upon and dangerous 
> as the camera will unexpectedly announce BYE! and shut down in the middle 
> of shooting. You need to compose through the OPTICAL view finder (no ELF 
> garbage here, glass only baby) and, more importantly, compose in your 
> head. 
> 
> It slows you down, It makes you think. It's quiet. You zoom with your 
> feet. The Digilux, Digilux Zoom and the Digilux 4.3 are the only real 
> digital cameras true Leica users prefer. The M-9 with it's auto-everything 
> is like a television compared to the works of Shakespeare in a fine folio 
> edition.
> 
> (& now, thanks to Clayton McKee i have now cornered the market on Smart 
> Media cards. If I can just get this thing connected to a car battery, I 
> can shoot all afternoon.)
> 
> 
> kc
> 
> p.s. does anybody know how many digilux's and digilux 4.3's were made? 
> each of them had a production run of less than six months, so i'm thinking 
> there can't be that many of them. which, you know, makes them rare. like 
> shark attacks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG) ([Leica] flowers with an old old (& rare) leica)