Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji's rangefinder sort of looking digital
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:06:00 -0400
References: <4C97C0D9.8050709@panix.com> <C8BD41A3.3BAC%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I have one or two cameras with castrated lenses.  They work well for 
those high key shots.


At 04:51 PM 9/20/2010, you wrote:
>http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fixed
>
>--------------------
>Mark William Rabiner
>Photography
>mark at rabinergroup.com
>
>
> > From: Rei Shinozuka <shino at panix.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:15:21 -0400
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji's rangefinder sort of looking digital
> >
> >   fixed as in permanently affixed to the camera, and fixed as in fixed
> > focal length (i.e., prime or non-zoom), but not fixed as in fixed focus.
> >
> > fixed is an overloaded term.
> >
> > -rei
> >
> >
> > On 09/20/2010 03:37 PM, Sonny Carter wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:28 PM, kyle cassidy on the LUG<
> >> leicaslacker at gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> i think it said "fixed lens" didn't it? or did they just mean it's not 
> >>> a
> >>> zoom?
> >>>
> >> Fixed as in you cannot change it.  It is glued on the front.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:25 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> It did not say what lens mount they were using, it would be nice if it
> >>> was the M mount.  Also too bad it is APS-C sensor and not full 
> frame.  ;-)
> >>>> Gene
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "slobodan Dimitrov"<s.dimitrov at charter.net>
> >>>> To: "Leica Users Group"<lug at leica-users.org>
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:09:20 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada 
> >>>> Central
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Fuji's rangefinder sort of looking digital
> >>>>
> >>>> ...or maybe they know something, and decided to be the first out the
> >>> gate!
> >>>> S.d.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sep 19, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Bryan Willman wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hmmmm....
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A little bigger than an X1, but with at least the potential to 
> >>>>> compete
> >>>>> with the X1's outstanding image quality.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The body apparently not so much smaller than an M9, but surely much
> >>>>> cheaper.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And the viewfinder tech may turn out to be very very 
> interesting indeed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> An interesting camera indeed, and perhaps a good "motivator" for
> >>>>> Leica...
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Chris Saganich MS, CPH
Senior Physicist, Office of Health Physics
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York Presbyterian Hospital
chs2018 at med.cornell.edu
http://intranet.med.cornell.edu/research/health_phys/
Ph. 212.746.6964
Fax. 212.746.4800
Office A-0049


Replies: Reply from dmorton at gmail.com (David Morton) ([Leica] Fuji's rangefinder sort of looking digital)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Fuji's rangefinder sort of looking digital)
In reply to: Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Fuji's rangefinder sort of looking digital)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Fuji's rangefinder sort of looking digital)