Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (no subject)
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:38:32 +0200
References: <C8B75594.3740%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Le 16 sept. 10 ? 11:03, Mark Rabiner a ?crit :

>
> I guess focal lengths right sometimes.
> With guessing the more you do it the more rights you get.
>
Same here.
I started early Mark, and was alway right back then
http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/189749-1/P1140408.JPG

;-)
Amiti?s
Philippe


> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> mark at rabinergroup.com
>
>
>> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 04:14:17 -0400
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] (no subject)
>>
>> There are people over on the LUF who can tell you exactly which  
>> Leica lens
>> you used on a photo.  Since I don't keep notes and can't remember  
>> lenses, I
>> guess sometimes.  Some people correct me and say "That couldn't  
>> possibly be
>> the 35 Summilux, it has the signature of the 35 Summicron."  or  
>> something
>> like that.  I can tell Leica lenses from Canons but not which lens  
>> and only
>> in my own work when I can examine it at 100%.
>>
>> Tina
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
NO ARCHIVE




Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (no subject))
Reply from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] (no subject))
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (no subject))