Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:45:37 -0400
References: <AANLkTinpGUTz7rc5NqoyXydFRFxDK3-NhFX9wdMzHqLm@mail.gmail.com> <1BC780C4-D0F8-484A-AE37-013C457826C1@mac.com> <AANLkTinpFuwBi8VmqPQLedz8BnBusdPUeeG2npmKoy46@mail.gmail.com> <A679E2C3-05E6-4D46-8676-8AC3B785F2CC@mac.com> <AANLkTinnZgWHYpMAnMxoaLznvH5AhbrZcfH8qXH+xQF3@mail.gmail.com> <927D3939-3B79-469D-B69C-BAAA66DA73DF@mac.com> <72A78113-26E8-4BA7-B078-CAC35A45DCE3@embarqmail.com> <8CE3EEF2-05D2-4395-B7EC-5CF403EE6C24@mac.com> <379DC6CB-8464-471F-A852-8B498210178F@mac.com>

Yea, but in this outfit, it's bringing in an image made by a lens--inverted 
and reversed left/right

left/right never changes in the mirrors, 1, 2 or 50

try your experiment viewing the back of your view camera

ric


On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:29 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> should have been
>> \
> \ <
> 
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser 
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:26 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> 
>> Nope.
>> I just did the experiment.
>> two mirrors in periscope orientation
>> shows correct view right to left and vertical.
>>> \
>> \<
>> 
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser 
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Ric Carter wrote:
>> 
>>> wouldn't a second mirror, just like the first, leave left and right, but 
>>> flip vertical?
>>> 
>>> Doesn't it take a pentaprism to reverse left/right?
>>> 
>>> ric
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:12 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Well it certainly would be reversed if looking through only the one 
>>>> mirror.
>>>> However that 45? finder would have to have a second mirror
>>>> which would bring it back around.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
In reply to: Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Hey, is that a Visoflex?)