[Leica] New R Solution?

[photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)]

George, I may have phrased it not clearly enough. Corporate profit is not a 
criterion for us to purchase something, but it IS a criterion for the 
company deciding whether to invest in the development of an R10.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

YNWA





On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:23 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> Interesting.
> I certainly understand what you mean.
> 
> Yet I've never thought of corporate profit as
> a purchasing criterion for cameras or lenses;
> until this moment.
> 
> Kept buying Leica
> through all their economic roller coaster rides
> since my first M3 back in the mid '60's;
> never thought about their bottom line.
> 
> Just bought, used, and loved their gear.
> 
> And enjoyed the fact that they generally
> maintained great resale value.
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser 
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> 
>> Sadly, as much as some of us love Leica SLRs, none of them ever met that 
>> criterion.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>