Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Flare Question......
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:02:54 +0100
References: <00f801cb4e04$7e747c30$7b5d7490$@earthlink.net>

This may not apply to the Elmarit but my Tele-Elmarit was prone to flare and 
even though the internal haze on the element surfaces was barely noticeable, 
even with a torch shining through, a CLA made a -big- difference.
FWIW
Frank Dernie

On 6 Sep, 2010, at 21:45, Frank Filippone wrote:

> I got some flare from my 90 Elmarit M ( the one with the built in hood)...
> and I was surprised.
> 
> The (partial) background ( and source of the flare) was the reflected light
> from a very bright wall, the foreground ( also called subject material) was
> a group of dancers under a tall roof.....  so I was shooting under the 
> roof,
> while the wall was a long way away, but visible in a corner of the image
> area
> 
> Exposure was 1 / 250 at F2.8... background would have been sunny 16..... 
> F16
> at 1 /160....  M8, UV/IR Filter on the lens.
> 
> Do you think I would have had the same results if I had used a different 
> 90?
> AA?
> 
> PS.. Did not get flare using my Tri Elmar.....F4 @ 1/125... same camera
> position, obviously different field of view....
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at earthlink.net
> 



In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Flare Question......)