Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35 mm format is best?
From: daniel at dlridings.se (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:05:06 +0200
References: <380-220108426161316414@M2W121.mail2web.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100826135239.0349f008@med.cornell.edu> <00a901cb454d$76724630$6356d290$@earthlink.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20100826152747.03724008@med.cornell.edu>

You guy's haven't toted anything until you've run around with Jim
Hemenway's Leica. I can't find a picture of it now, but he's posted
one before.

It takes 11x14 film.

Daniel

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Chris Saganich <chs2018 at med.cornell.edu> 
wrote:
>
> Yep, ?I only drive it places now.
>
> At 02:35 PM 8/26/2010, you wrote:
>>
>> But you kept the 4x5?
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>> Red735i at earthlink.net
>>
>>
>>
>> Once upon a time I carried a 4x5 on a tripod on my shoulder around
>> Brooklyn.
>> Then I put a Leica on the tripod. ?Then I dumped to Tripod.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)