Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hmm, I'd think I'd rather have a 5x4 view camera. Using 6x9 is best done (well cheaper anyway) with a secondhand (or maybe thirteenthhand) Voigtlander Bessa. I've a 1936 rangefinder one with a Helomar lens which works well. OK tilt and shift it doesn't do.... Douglas _________ Douglas Barry Bray, Co. Wicklow Republic of Ireland ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:35 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Tilt-Shift Miniatures > The Arca-Swiss F-Classic C 6x9 View Camera is another option which I've > always has my eye on. > It's gorgous. > I'd have it set up in the middle of the room all day so I could stare at > it. > Check out the F-Line Compact 6X9. > http://www.badgergraphic.com/store/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=7 > > > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Lottermoser George <imagist3 at mac.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 09:11:43 -0500 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Tilt-Shift Miniatures >> >> Exactly. >> >> (and the Silvestri Flexicam offers some very elegant suggestions for a >> smaller >> framework >> which could easily mount our live view sensor/articulated screen module) >> >> as does the Cambo X2 Pro >> <http://www.cambo.com/Html/products_photo/set01/english/internet/Item752.html> >> >> and the Hasselblad Flexbody >> >> So engineers have been grappling with these possibilities for quite some >> time. >> The real missing link is the live view sensor >> (with micro prisms for correcting angle of incidence issues) >> and articulated screen module. >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Henning Wulff wrote: >> >>> I think what George was referring to (and certainly what I was thinking >>> of) >>> was something like a camera for 35mm sized CMOS sensor, which wouldn't >>> need a >>> sliding back or other optical viewing path, but could have a larger LCD >>> live >>> view screen. The whole package could weigh 1/4 or less what those MF >>> solutions do and could produce quality that is sufficient for most >>> purposes. >>> Of course, if it had a 6x7cm format CMOS with 100Mp, live view sensor >>> and was >>> affordable, that would be even better. :-) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >