Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]But it is certainly not slower. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog YNWA On Aug 10, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Robert D. Baron wrote: > It is interesting to note that as of right now on the Adobe Lightroom > Discussion Forum http://forums.adobe.com/community/lightroom the topic > Why Is Lightroom3 So Slow? has 43,808 views and 902 replies. > > -Bob > > ==On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Frank <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote: >> The bug fixes have some pretty rudimentary "repairs"..... >> >> The renaming to V3.2 is explained in detail... and is really worth a >> laugh >> if you have the time. >> >> Like I once said.... always let your best buddy be the first to upgrade >> his >> SW to the latest version..... >> >> Frank Filippone >> Red735i at earthlink.net >> >> And I see Adobe has put out a pre-release beta of LR3.2....they are >> skipping >> 3.1! Look at the list of bug fixes: >> >> http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Lightroom_3.2 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >