Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I rate mine at 64 too. Someone suggested previously rating it at 80, but that didn't work out for me. Charlie Chan Cheltenham, UK topoxforddoc at btinternet.com www.cancer-surgeon.co.uk www.charlie-chan.co.uk On 1 Aug 2010, at 21:32, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > 64 > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > YNWA > > > > > > On Aug 1, 2010, at 9:48 PM, Richard Man wrote: > >> OK, I know generally people rate their slides slightly lower (although >> when >> I was shooting Provia/Sensia/Astia, I just use their ISO rating). How >> about >> Kodachrome K64? I have 4 rolls and will be heading into Yosemite in a few >> days for a day trip. Any recommendation? >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> >> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> >> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> >> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all >> previous >> replies in your msgs. ] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information