Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Considering that this guy wouldn't be near the printer answer was, it looks pretty plausible to me. http://ricknorsigian.com/ Leo On Jul 28, 2010, at 7:12 AM, John Edwin Mason <profmason at yahoo.com> wrote: > Richard's right. Ansel's grandson does dispute the authenticity of the > photos. His argument doesn't seem particularly strong to me. My guess is > that it's about protecting the brand -- and the profits. > > Here's a story from the Telegraph: > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-news/7913901/Ansel-Adams-discovery-sparks-row-as-family-say-negatives-are-fakes.html > > --John > > ****************************** > John Edwin Mason, Photography: > http://www.JohnEdwinMason.com > Charlottesville and Cape Town > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information