Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:10:52 -0400
References: <2036684.1278623019795.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

then your problem is not with the photo's "reality", but its procedure?

I can see your point as some violation of some frame-faithful photographer's 
artistic integrity, but that's another discussion

ric




On Jul 8, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Philip F wrote:

> Nope. No problem if the photographer took those steps to make it. 
> Phil Forrest
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com>
>> Sent: Jul 8, 2010 3:05 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic
>> 
>> Here we go with the mojo voodoo of the frame again. What is the frame but 
>> the first crop of the scene?
>> 
>> What is its magic?
>> 
>> Would you have to problem if the photographer took a couple of steps and 
>> deleted here from the original frame?
>> 
>> ric
>> 
>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Philip F wrote:
>> 
>>> The issue is not one of cropping but one of omitting an element that was 
>>> in the frame. 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)
In reply to: Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip F) ([Leica] Photoshopping truth - a polemic)