Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Quite a few others, mostly photojournalists, disagree. http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/7/5/881784/-BUSTED:-The-Economist-Photoshops-Obama-To-Make-Him-Look-More-Depressed-And-Alone <http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/7/5/881784/-BUSTED:-The-Economist-Photoshops-Obama-To-Make-Him-Look-More-Depressed-And-Alone> Tina On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 11:39 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>wrote: > Precisely the point. > > Editing with malicious intent to deceive and mislead > and > Editing with aesthetic and editorial intent to provide a strong cover > design > are two entirely different matters. > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Greg Lorenzo wrote: > > > I see Uncle Joe's murderous process as somehow quite different from an > editor's decision to remove a couple of people on Obama's beach who > themselves should have no concern that they in fact could disappear one > day. > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com