Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think these issues need consideration on a case by case basis. In this case - they produced a fine cover and presented the reality of Obama's visit. I have no doubt that a moment before or a few moments after Obama probably did experience more personal space around him. The altered image does no present some horrible lie. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Jul 6, 2010, at 8:52 PM, Philip Forrest wrote: > So Mark, do you care if an editor uses one of your images and removes > two people in your work, potentially changing the impact along many > axes in the eye of the viewer? What if it is not how you wanted the > image presented? > > It IS better for the magazine cover,the way it was edited, but that > way > it was edited was also potentially very wrong. Unless one just cares > about the dolla billz and not the truth or the historical record. In > that case, 'shop away!