Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?"
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 19:42:05 -0500 (CDT)
References: <C8527133.6403B%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I like your shot of the Dom very much!   Very dramatic and very  
pleasing B&W tonality.

Robert

On Jul 1, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

>> The 21f1.4 has become my most used lens.   I went to LeMans France  
>> with
>> a 12, a 21, and a 35.  Don't recall using the 35 at all.  Used the  
>> 12 a
>> little.  (I had an X1 that did some duties a 35 would have done.)
>>
>> Something to think about is do you want the 21 or the 24.
>>
>> Historically, Leica didn't make a 24, there was a 28 and a 21.
>>
>> Now, you can get lenses down to 12, and Leica makes them down to  
>> what,
>> 16?
>>
>> But the 21f1.4 and 24f1.4 are ultra-fast and very wide.
>>
>> Since I often shoot the 21 without the accessory finder (point and  
>> guess
>> or center with the finder and guess) I sometimes wonder if the 24  
>> (which
>> is probably easy to guesstimate with the main finder) might not  
>> also be
>> very good.
>>
>> In a few days I'll finish a sofobomo book, and post the link here  
>> since
>> it's all Leica shots.
>> (Many with the 21f1.4)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+bryanwi=bryanwi.com at leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+bryanwi=bryanwi.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>> Vick Ko
>> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 6:06 AM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: [Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?"
>>
>> Is the 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?"
>>
>> What are users finding?
>>
>> Vick
>>
>
> The current 24 and 21 ASPH's are in a way sister lenes which work  
> well as a
> team which was what I used to do. I'd go back and forth between  
> them. And
> you had to look real hard to make sure you had the one on the  
> camera you
> thought you did. And make sure you were using the right view finder  
> thingie.
> The 21 is a bit heavier but otherwise identical. It saws "21" on it.
> The 24 was the first of the new breed of ASPH lenes made by Leica  
> using
> cutting edge technologies so the price did not go through the roof  
> and this
> for me revolutionized Leica shooting. I'd go from the 24 to the 21  
> and back
> again.
> The 21mm focal lengh attained classicness with the use of the  
> Schneider
> Super Angulon f4 then f3.4 for some a main or only reason to have a  
> Leica
> hanging off ones neck. Their main camera might be an early Nikon F.
>
> Here's a shot I did with my 21 ASPH.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ 
> 060929_lhsa_wetz_158.jpg.html
> The dome in cologne.
> Or K?lner Dom.
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cologne_Cathedral
>
> The Cologne Cathedral was of the very first things a Leica was ever  
> pointed
> at by Barnack. He was able to shoot it from a ways off. There were  
> less
> buildings.
>
> But now, Vick its not 16mm but 18 which defines the preferred outer  
> limit
> 18mm f/3.8 Super-Elmar-M Aspherical
> Making the use of the 21 focal length in a way mediocre. Or medium
> something. ... Not the bee's knees.
>
> Though you could use a Super Wide Angle/Wide Angle Tri-Elmar-M  
> 16-18-21mm
> f/4 Aspherical Manual Focus Lens (6-Bit, Updated for Digital)
> Leica's answer to the ultra wide angle zooms which have captured the
> imagination and real world workflo of a huge percentage of working  
> shooters.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?")