Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The problem with Robot lenses is that they weigh a ton. Everything in the Robot lineup weighs a lot more than I'm willing to carry and they don't suit the lightweight G series. The mount is actually an interrupted thread bayonet, and is probably the most secure and solid lensmount ever made. Also, since the basic design is for a 24x24 camera, and only later did they add a 24x36, the diameter of the mount is rather small, and the lenses are therefore generally slow although a couple were f/2 and f/1.9. At 11:00 AM -0400 4/11/10, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: >Al writes: >"For the adventurous owner of a GF-1 who does not have the 20mm/f1.7 lens, >here > >is an alternate source for a fairly-thin pancake lens. You can modify an >Industar 69 (28mm f2.8 LTM lens for Chaika half-frame camera) and use >it with an >LTM adapter." > > >That looks like a vary nice adaptation. But Russian lenses are not the >only candidates for adaption. If you hunt through the old lens bins at >camera store clearance sales there are a number of high quality lenses >with a short back focus that could be modified to fit a micro 4/3 >mount. Lenses for Robot cameras had, as I recall, a back focus of >30mm, as did lenses for the Olympus Pen F. The Robot lenses were made >by Zeiss and were very highly regarded. They had focal lengths from >32.5mm through 75mm. The mount was a very simple screw thread and >could be easily altered. Calumet sold several adapters for the Robot >lenses. The Oly Pen lenses could be similarly modified. The Pen F >series of cameras had excellent lenses. Trust Eugene Smith. > >Larry Z > -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com