Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Mark, > > I agree with all of your reasons. That's not my point. People have been > doing this sort of thing for almost a century. I have my late > father-in-law's studio camera boxed up out in my garage, a wooden 8x10 > monster, with a wooden crank-up tripod. For the sake of economy, he had > fitted it with a 5x7 back that was designed to provide two 3.5x5 exposures > on 5x7 sheet film. That was how he made portraits, which he sold to put > food on the table. And, with that equipment, he turned out beautiful work. > We have a lot of family portraits that attest to that. > > My point is that there are no rigid rules that determine the way cameras > and > lenses are put to use. Many of our LUG family choose to use M lenses on > the > M8, and make fine photos. At a lower price point, I choose to use Leica-R > lenses on Olympus 4/3 bodies. The combination meets my needs quite well, > though I know that users of M8 and M9 bodies can get better results. I > have > no need for photo murals, nor extreme definition, and, hence can't justify > the price difference. I just get tired of your tirades about the negative > side of such equipment choices. There is more between the M8 and the M9 than a larger format. [Rabs] Mark William Rabiner