Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]2010-02-26-23:59:08 Wendy Thurman: > While of course a Leica 35 cron is, well, a Leica, I would > appreciate opinions or experiences any of you may have with this lens. > It's > affordably priced and appears to be generally well-regarded. I really like the lens. It seems to me like, if the pre-ASPH 35mm Summicron were a little bit sharper all around... this is what it'd look like. A downside is that it sticks easily twice as far out from the camera as the pre-ASPH Summicron. And I'm not sure how well its all-aluminum bones will last in the fullness of time. But the smoothness and coherence of out-of-focus areas, taken with the fine detail of stuff in-focus, is something it does very very well. Possibly more well than anything else that comes to mind. The 35mm Summilux ASPH (which is a workhorse for me) can get kind of jangly as things go out of focus. Not sure about the Summicron ASPH. I bet this Zeiss doesn't resolve quite as finely at f/2.0 as the Leica Summicron ASPH. The Zeiss seems to have a particular sweet spot at f/4.0... the picture below is an example. I'd leave it at f/4 all day if I could. You see how detailed teh little birdie's feathers and beak and little birdy feet are, and how Robert's face behind the bird is softened, but maintains its shapes and shadings. http://photos.bazbarfoo.com/Scratch/LUGmisc1/11359884_aTkKE#797916850_MUA4X-A-LB I'll leave access to the full-res image (size "O" for Original) available for a few days so you can pixel-peep. -J