Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Aram writes: Hi Ted. As a former track athlete and coach, this is one very perplexing rule. It has been around for quite some time, including those Olympics that you have shot. Here are a few links: http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/question702.htm http://www.condellpark.com/kd/reactiontime.htm So, the anticipation of 0.10 seconds has been wired into starting blocks for decades, I believe. It use to be that you were not DQ'd for a violation of the 0.10 second rule, and the race was just restarted, but I guess in 2003 that changed. Now this year they have changed again so you can be DQ'd after the first "false start". No more one for free. - - - - - - The second URL explains the concept of false start and reaction time better than anything I have ever read. Although specific to track athletes, the data are applicable to photographers who question the relevance of exposure lag. Anticipation is the key to getting great pictures of spur of the moment events. You simply can't react fast enough. Luck helps too. Larry Z