Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Many years ago, I took part in a discussion on Depth of Field. I went to my physics/optics books and ran the equations as well as doing some actual shooting of pictures. As a starting point, the Scheimpflug effect does not care about the camera!!! Tilting the film and lens is a significant advantage of a view camera. That was the reason I got a view camera a long time ago. The following discussion is based on not being close to the hyperfocal distance for any of the lenses. The closer you are to the hyperfocal distance, the less the optical equations are exact. If you change the lens focal length and then your distance to the subject so the image size on the film is the same, the depth of field will be the same for the same F-stop no matter what focal length you use. We always say that a wide angle lens has a larger depth of field. That is true because we are essentially saying that the image size for some object in the picture is smaller than if we used a longer lens and stayed in the same place. If we just went further away from the subject with out changing the lens, the depth of field around the subject would increase as the subject is now smaller. Again, if we are getting to where the hyperfocal distance is within our range/F-stop, then the optical equations do not take that into account. +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+= Linda & Warren Pearce Colorado Springs