Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 vs E3
From: ricc at (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:11:36 -0500
References: <>

i've been wondering if that might be a good path for replacing my OM-4 for 
my meager telephoto work--mostly with a 300 Zuiko and multiplier.


On Jan 26, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote:

>  I'm relatively poor, so I don't have either the M8 or M9. Assuming that 
> they're better, I can still print very convincing 11x14-ish sized prints 
> from these:
> For the $500 or so that I paid for it, the resulting prints look very food.

Replies: Reply from Jim at (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] M9 vs E3)
In reply to: Message from Jim at (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] M9 vs E3)